Friday, October 20, 2006

Finally, I am blogging again. I realise that I usually blogs during the weekends. Perhaps I must hang some tag somewhere to say that I am a weekend blogger, just like a Singaporean weekend car. Kekeke.

During one of the daily morning drive to work, I was blasting the radio to keep me company and you know how the MDT radio works, they try to be funny and keep you entertained so that advertisers can entice you to get that MacDonald's brekky on the way to work or worse, ask you to stop pretending and call us today to try the nasal technology to cure your premature ejaculation.

To one that came out of the advertising industry, I could only wonder how much the advertisers are paying just to get themsleves heard rather that being drawn to buy this or that.

Anyway, my point is, I was listening to the DJs talking and they were talking about Jince. The lady DJ was going on and on about Jince are going strong together and the male DJ was asking wat or who in the world is Jince. Would you believe it guys? Jince is actually the couple name for Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaugh. Jince. LOL.

Then they went on sprouting some more common Hollywood couple names such as Tom-Kat (Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes), Bradalina (Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie), ex-Bennifer (Ben Affleck & Jennifer Lopez), ha ha ha all the way.

And they started asking us listerners to contribute couple names if they are blessed with one. This one started me heckling along with the radio.

They had one bloke calling in to say that his name is Tim and his wife is Tammy. What would you have guess it? Their couple name is Tim-Tam. Then the mean male DJ said that it is lucky that the guy wasn't named Pon, if not the couple would be named Tam-XXX. Buahahaha...Aussie humour at its best.

I dun think me and Ernest have any couple name. It is quite coincident that his name starts with an E and mine too. We have toyed with E-square and EE, but nope, none of them sounds as cool as Tim-Tam.

Dun anyone start on thinking about couple names for us ok? No need. Thanks.

No comments: